Comments on: Making Unity work more like the others http://www.chrisvandesteeg.nl/2009/04/16/making-unity-work-more-like-the-others/ What's practical is logical Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:10:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Ray http://www.chrisvandesteeg.nl/2009/04/16/making-unity-work-more-like-the-others/comment-page-1/#comment-43759 Ray Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:41:54 +0000 http://www.chrisvandesteeg.nl/?p=80#comment-43759 @Chris: Thanks. So it's more that you don't care about their names rather than having a 'default' implementation, you simply want to treat them all implementations of the interface as a collection. @Chris: Thanks. So it’s more that you don’t care about their names rather than having a ‘default’ implementation, you simply want to treat them all implementations of the interface as a collection.

]]> By: Chris van de Steeg http://www.chrisvandesteeg.nl/2009/04/16/making-unity-work-more-like-the-others/comment-page-1/#comment-43647 Chris van de Steeg Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:06:27 +0000 http://www.chrisvandesteeg.nl/?p=80#comment-43647 @Ray: sure, let's say you have a an interface IBootable with 1 method : Execute In your application startup you can say foreach(IBootable bootable in IoC.ResolveAll<ibootable>()) bootable.Execute()</ibootable> @Ray: sure, let’s say you have a an interface IBootable with 1 method : Execute
In your application startup you can say

foreach(IBootable bootable in IoC.ResolveAll())
bootable.Execute()

]]> By: Ray http://www.chrisvandesteeg.nl/2009/04/16/making-unity-work-more-like-the-others/comment-page-1/#comment-43633 Ray Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:19:01 +0000 http://www.chrisvandesteeg.nl/?p=80#comment-43633 I'm not sure why you would want to register the same interface with two different default (?), i.e. unnamed Types. Can you give a use case? I’m not sure why you would want to register the same interface with two different default (?), i.e. unnamed Types. Can you give a use case?

]]>